12 Responses to “Jordan Peterson – Why You Shouldn’t Lie & The Truth About DMT”

1. 
   Gama / 22 Jan 2018 8:54am #

   love these, thank you

2. 
   Tree Topley / 24 Jan 2018 11:31pm #

   Why’d you put these two lectures together?

3. 
   Ronny Wallberg / 26 Jan 2018 11:11am #

   .
   The one who begins to lie, soon lies to himself, and then an inner chaos arises in him in which he is in conflict with himself and becomes self-destructive and aggressively outgoing
   .
   Those who do not like themselves do not look into their own minds, do not ask themselves the questions and therefore do not receive any answers

4. 
   Ronny Wallberg / 26 Jan 2018 11:15am #

   There are many kind of lights but only one darkness

5. 
   Toastcano718 / 2 Feb 2018 3:30am #

   Dmt is some satanic fuckshit idk why Joe Rogan swears by it

6. 
   Dawid Czerniak / 7 Feb 2018 11:38pm #

   Amazing…. the only thing I can think of here

7. 
   Oregon Tex Fyb / 12 Feb 2018 5:26am #

   The audacity of that bitch to get up and walk out how dare you?

8. 
   Buddy Silver / 12 Feb 2018 11:00am #

   I’M CALLING OUT JORDAN B PETERSON:
   When you have the BALLS to address this article, THEN and only THEN can you say you are a TRUTH warrior:

   GENTILES IN HALACHA
   Foreword — Daat Emet
   In this article R’ Bar-Chayim discusses the attitude towards “Gentiles” in the Torah and in the Halacha and comes to an unambiguous conclusion:

   “The Torah of Israel makes a clear distinction between a Jew, who is defined as ‘man,’ and a Gentile.”

   That is to say, any notion of equality between human beings is irrelevant to the Halacha. R’ Bar-Chayim’s work is comprehensive, written with intellectual honesty, and deals with almost all the aspects of Halachic treatment of non-Jews. It also refutes the statements of those rabbis who speak out of wishful thinking and, influenced by concepts of modern society, claim that Judaism does not discriminate against people on religious grounds. R’ Bar-Chayim shows that all these people base their constructs NOT on the Torah but solely on the inclinations of their own hearts. He also shows that there are even rabbis who intentionally distort the Halachic attitude to Gentiles, misleading both themselves and the general public.

   For the English readers’ convenience we will briefly mention the topics dealt with in R’ Bar-Chayim’s article:

   Laws in regard to murder, which clearly state that there is Halachic difference between murder of a Jew and of a Gentile (the latter is considered a far less severe crime).
   A ban on desecrating the Sabbath to save the life of a Gentile.
   A Jew’s exemption from liability if his property (e. g. ox) causes damage to a Gentile’s property. But if a Gentile’s property causes damage to a Jew’s property, the Gentile is liable.
   The question of whether robbery of a Gentile is forbidden by the Torah’s law or only by a Rabbinic decree.
   A ban on returning a lost item to a Gentile if the reason for returning it is one’s sympathy towards the Gentile and compassion for him.
   The sum which a Gentile overpays in a business transaction due to his own error is forfeit; whether a Jew is permitted to intentionally deceive a Gentile is also discussed.
   One who kidnaps a Jew is liable to death, but one who kidnaps a Gentile is exempt.
   A Jew who hurts or injures a Gentile is not liable for compensation of damage, but a Gentile who hurts a Jew is liable to death.
   One who overcharges a Gentile ought not return him the sum that the Gentile overpaid.
   A Gentile — or even a convert to Judaism — may not be appointed king or public official of any sort (e. g. a cabinet minister).
   One who defames a female proselyte (claiming that she was not virgin at the time of her marriage) is liable to neither lashes nor fine.
   The prohibition to hate applies only to Jews; one may hate a Gentile.
   One may take revenge against or bear a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise, the commandment “love your neighbour” applies only to Jews, not to Gentiles.
   One who sees Gentile graveyards should curse: “Your mother shall be greatly ashamed…”
   Gentiles are likened to animals.
   If an ox damaged a Gentile maidservant, it should be considered as though the ox damaged a she-ass.
   The dead body of a Gentile does not bear ritual impurity, nor does a Gentile who touches the dead body of a Jew become impure — he is considered like an animal who touched a dead body.
   One is forbidden to pour anointing oil on a Jew, but there is no ban on pouring that oil on a Gentile because Gentiles are likened to animals.
   An animal slaughtered by a Gentile is forbidden, even if the ritual slaughter performed was technically correct, because Gentiles are deemed like animals. (Daat Emet does not agree that this is the Halachic reason for invalidating a Gentile’s ritual slaughter — but this is not the place to delve into the subject).
   Their members (genitals) are like those of asses” — Gentiles are likened to animals.

   Between the Jews and the Gentiles — In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought
   R’ Bar-Chayim’s arguments and conclusions are clear, Halachically accurate, and supported by almost all the existent major Halachic works. It would be superfluous to say that R’ Bar-Chayim fully embraces this racist Halachic outlook as the word of the Living G-d, as he himself pointed out in the “Conclusion” of his article:

   “It is clear to every Jew who accepts the Torah as G-d’s word from Sinai, obligatory and valid for all generations, that it is impossible to introduce ‘compromises’ or ‘renovations’ into it.”

   On the other hand, we want to make it clear that Daat Emet — as well as any reasonable people who do not embrace Halachic laws as the word of the Living G-d — are repulsed by such evil, racist discrimination.
   In the Hebrew text we have abridged the second part of R’ Bar-Chayim’s article,
   “Between Jews and Gentiles — In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought,” because, in our view, the Halacha is the law which obligates every religious Jew while concepts of the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and Jewish thought are not binding on anyone, as our rabbis have already written:
   “And so the Aggadic constructs of the disciples of disciples, such as Rav Tanchuma and Rabbi Oshaya and their like — most are incorrect, and therefore we do not rely on the words of Aggadah” (Sefer HaEshkol, Laws of a Torah Scroll, p. 60a); we have expanded on this issue in the portion of Vayeshev.

   GOOGLE:

   THE JEWS ARE CALLED MEN

   Tzfi’a 3

   THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN JEWS AND GENTILES IN TORAH

   Rabbi David Bar Chaim

   Yeshivat Mercaz HaRav

   office@machonshilo.org

9. 
   Salim Huerta / 13 Feb 2018 3:41am #

   Lying is what started religion, all shared truth systems emergent of the collective unconscious are lies that are forced to be true by brute force, including the self that Jung went on about that was the first lie, the best lies or mythologies are the most adaptive and they are preserved, mathematical models of the world are lies with a minimal error rate. Psychology is self deception, the ultimate goal is truth without fail, without lying purposefully or accidentally.

10. 
    Allan Smithee / 13 Feb 2018 11:51am #

    Does anyone know of a place to watch the full lectures? I hate only getting segments wherever i look

11. 
    Alex Torvi / 14 Feb 2018 5:31am #

    Unless you’ve gone through a dmt experience, you can’t have a lecture on it. He’s part of the institutional brainwashing

12. 
    C E W / 20 Feb 2018 3:10am #

    When I underwent my “mushroom experiments” I remember once the foosball game I was playing sounded hilarious! I couldn’t stop laughing. Very nice trip thank you.